Frederick Engel’s “The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State: in the light of the researches of Lewis H. Morgan” ( which I have read way back in college) shows how families originate (of course!), resulting into a bourgeois concept of a family.
Sample quote: “Bourgeois law dictates the rules for relationships and inheritances. As such, two partners, even when their marriage is not arranged, will always have the preservation of inheritance in mind and as such will never be entirely free to choose their partner. For Engels, a relationship based on property rights and forced monogamy will only lead to the proliferation of immorality and prostitution.”
And so, I defended my principle, that marriage will not lessen any complication (if there is any). Think about gay and lesbian relationships. I do sympathize with them, and the kinds of discrimination that some of them go through give them emotional torture – fascist bigotry!
Though, in my present state of mind, I don’t go for polygamy, group marriage etc. It’s just the thought that when you want to be with someone, the concept of marriage is not important anymore for it only boils down to the concept of economy and bourgeois property. Why not invest more on emotional foundations – love, affection, sharing, values on how to make each other worthy as beings. Some say “The best things in the world cannot be seen by the naked eye.” - (Helen Keller) – exactly my point.
But just to clarify, I am not against marriage. Of course, once (or twice?) in my life, I daydream of wearing a bridal gown, walking down the aisle with the love of your life and saying I do.
This friend of mine misinterpreted my reply; he said “Don’t frown at tomorrow!” Not having a chance to marry is not a valid reason to frown at tomorrow, I guess. As long as you have found the right person to be with forever..
Peace out O**r! Hahahah.. This guy is gonna marry soon that’s why he asked me that question.
weow! that really makes sense to me... i agree with you..=) haha!
ReplyDeletehahahah.. that doesn't mean that we're just trying to defend our present state of affairs but we truly understand what pure love is! ;-)
ReplyDeleteIndeed, marriage does not lessen complications. It just brings a relationship to a new level where there are different sets of struggles. ;)
ReplyDeleteAlthough it is romantic to think that developing "emotional foundations" is all we need, at the present state of society, the institution of marriage is necessary to protect the parties concerned and the relationship itself (in our case, the protection of the movement).
Parang kilala ko yang friend mo... inimbitahan ko yata siya sa kasal ko. hmm
yeah, i understand, i need to look into that part again. ibang level naman talaga pag yan na pinaguusapan madz. congratulations on your weeding pala. :-D
ReplyDeletei am sticking to what i believe in : DIVORCE is the future tense of MARRIAGE..
ReplyDeletebut then i am considering the fact that some people are born lucky..
bitter? nah.. lol